Antiracist Decolonial Teaching and Writing… Still Here! (Thank you to the editor-writers, Sean Molloy, Conor ‘Coco’ Tomás Reed, Chy Sprauve, and Anna Zeemont, of the Fall 2026 issue of the JBW)

It seems that for many corners of the American university, antiracist decolonial teaching and writing were merely a trend, especially in 2020 during the protests against the murder of George Floyd during the pandemic. That moment’s commitment to racial justice was tragically short-lived, leaving especially the white American political consciousness faster than it arrived. We have now witnessed so much backtracking on supposed anti-racist commitments that overall comfort, speed, and ease towards a default of whiteness should seem suspicious at this point, especially in light of the multiple historical moments where a severe and regressive Post-Reconstruction backlash immediately followed Black Freedom Movements. For some of us, the fight against white settler colonization and anti-black racism was never about trend-chasing or public performance and we have a long line of ancestors that we draw from to situate ourselves culturally, intellectually, and politically in that kind of elsewhere. That’s what makes this issue of the journal, especially right now, all the more special. So thank you for not stepping back or piping down.

My piece is called “In Honor of the Earthworm: Pockets of Air for ‘Decolonial Riders’ and Activist Literacies in White Settler Writing Programs and English Departments.” I begin this piece with an embarrassing confession: once upon a time, I often referred to compositionists, writing teachers, and rhetoric scholars as WORMS. Yes, worms. I probably even said it right to people’s faces. Just spineless, no backbone, just a buncha folx who stand for nothing and stand up for even less… just worms squirming along. I am still as disgusted with the lack of political courage, structural analysis, activist organizing skill, and ideological awareness in the discipline, but I no longer complement such folx by calling them earthworms. That language represented an ableist standpoint framed by a total lack of eco-consciousness. As I explain in my piece, I am a gardener and I take great care of the earthworms who cross my path now because they redistribute all kinds of organic matter as they open pockets of air for everything. They decompose and aerate everything in their pursuits of original pathways that, in turn, help everything that they touch. We would be blessed to be rhetoric-compositionists like that. Our discipline would be transformed and our universities seriously challenged if we all behaved like earthworms. Instead, I turn to students, “decolonial riders,” and the “pockets of air” that they create. So my JBW is all about a young Black woman who I call Haven.

A center of gravity in my thinking these days involves really taking stock of the enormous lifting that Black students do to design a deep Black intellectual life on campuses and in departments and writing programs that block and/or criminalize that kind of emotional and scholarly labor. I don’t offer the usual thick description of students, writing, pedagogy, and classrooms that academic research asks of us though. That feels more and more like an anthropological and exploitative othering at a time when American universities have spent the last years shutting out even more Brown and Black students than before, whether it’s PWI or MSI.  If your praxis isn’t blazing open critical spaces for Brown and Black students, you shouldn’t be gazing scholarship on them either. So I turn my thick description onto the whiteness of university spaces where I meet students and place my gaze there and let me tell you, when it comes to anti-blackness and racism, the data is plentiful!  When you juxtapose the intense Black sociality that Black students pursue in the context of the violence surrounding their education and every institution they must navigate, you really see the enormity of their literate, rhetorical, and political imaginations. That a student like Haven could graduate from an American university that critical, that consciousness-devoted, that-feminist/womanist-confident, and that aesthetically-emboldened, all rooted in Blackness, is, as my grandmother would say, mo’ than just a notion. That is the story that helps me think beyond the discipline’s suffocating political inertia and whiteness. Those students are the “pockets of air”… and the like-minded colleagues (like in this journal issue) who move in different pathways.


Editors’ Column
, Chy Sprauve, Anna Zeemont, Conor Tomás Reed, and Sean Molloy

In Honor of the Earthworm: Pockets of Air for “Decolonial Riders” and Activist Literacies in White Settler Writing Programs and English Departments, Carmen Kynard

Antiracist Rhetorical Praxis in the 1960s-70s Tech News/The Paper at the City College of New York, Conor Tomás Reed, Anna Zeemont, and Sean Molloy

Oil/School: Land and Affiliation in the Age of Fossil Ed, Daisy Atterbury

Community Notes, CUNY & the Bronx County Historical Society Archives, Vani Kannan and Steven Payne

Activating Legacies of Freedom to Transform Economies of Prestige in Academia and Ourselves, Javiela Evangelista

Tracing the Canons/Cannons and Futures of Black Educational Theory in Graduate Classrooms

If I hadn’t taken multiple classes in the Africana studies department, I would have never read Black theorists in graduate school. In some ways, it was worse than my undergraduate education in that regard. In my undergraduate years, I had learned from professors like Kennell Jackson, Horace Porter, and Sylvia Wynter to question the intellectual origins of everything I was assigned, that the destruction of Black life was within those scripts. This means I didn’t read for awe or disciplinary coverage but to understand, like Chiekh Hamidou Kane’s book, Ambiguous Adventure, how they conquer without being in the right. I was expected to read and study deeply (on my own) the Black folx publishing at the exact same time as my assigned white authors alongside the political economies impacting Black life. Granted, my mentors didn’t necessarily tell me to give it a gangsta lean, but sometimes it’s just in you, not on you. I am still striving to meet my undergraduate professors’ standards and expectations, especially since they also modeled prolific writing, publishing, and researching. Because of them, I was a whole different kind of reader and writer by the time I got to graduate school.

For many of my graduate term papers, I often unleashed this title: “Blowin Up Spots: Why XXX Can’t Ever Really XXX.”  I wrote a version of this in so many of my non-Africana graduate classes and never seemed to get tired. Those were fun times, way back when I was “the young and the restless” so I still had them good knees and that pitbull-typa strength on folx neck. I would happily unleash a drive-by-shooting on every assigned author in a graduate course and trace the intellectual origins of their anti-Blackness. If you gon make me read this, then Ima REAAAD it! Many of my professors would often try to refute what I would say and I would just go harder with 5-10 MORE books and essays of preeminent Black scholars who disagreed. And why should I care if they didn’t like me? The feeling was mutual and, frankly, I don’t even remember their names now. You can’t be so psychologically overdetermined by imposter syndrome and coon-itis that you no longer recognize anti-Blackness and sub-intelligence. One professor was particularly stupid-brave, writing on one of my papers that “as a white man, he wasn’t interested in my ideas about counterhegemonic curricular design.” I couldn’t tell what was dumber: him thinking that or him putting that in writing. I called him Mickey D (yes, like the restaurant, McDonald’s) because I thought his intellect squared up with the corporate clown and all that overprocessed, unhealthiness. I stepped up to the plate: I copied negative reviews of his weak book, annotated his syllabus’s multiple errors, and took his handwritten comments with me to my meeting with the dean and my advisor. I was just two months into my first semester, but I figured I may as well set it off right. Perhaps surprisingly (to some), the administration was very supportive and validated my concerns about this faculty member, even at a PWI. Mickey D’s class was never required again. If someone’s syllabus was race-evasive and Eurocentric, I dropped the class and if the class was required, I worked with my advisor to bypass it on my transcript. My advisor was either tired of my mouth (or, more likely, amused), because he always accommodated my requests. I can’t stop the university from offering racist and/or outdated classes, but the university certainly can’t require them. My peers never spoke up, but that too is often typical. If it involves other BIPOC faculty and administrators, you can expect a level of public criticism. Racist white actors, on the other hand, often get a full pass, since going up against them would require more courage and risk.

Mickey D’s research was all about Brown and Black children in NYC schools, so it was only ethical that I get him good and told. In fact, that’s my birthright, paid for many times over by my ancestors– like all descendants of enslaved Africans! I wish I could pull him outta retirement (or grave, soon enough down the line) and dogg him out more.His anti-Blackness was typical of so many faculty though: racialized expectations of comportment, forced agreement no matter the inaccuracy or non-logic, continual downplaying of or silence around obvious racism, attempted management/overtalking of BIPOC dissent, lavish over-praise and welcomed participation for racist white actors, no accountability for present or past wrongs, no real analysis of the foundations of racial inequality baked into the program, no interventions in Black and Brown students’ experiences (while parading out the racially ambiguous/white-passing), endless pursuits at control of BIPOC/queer folx, and uncritical allegiance to (and thereby sustenance of) the white foundations/ white founders/ confederate statues of the program. None of that is surprising, but it is perplexing when university professors try this mess so regularly. Like, ma’am, we are full grown— do you not know you will get your full, grown ass whupped out here?

One of Mickey D’s favorites who loved his Culture-of-White-Comportment was a student with a few more years in the program than we first-years. She was a simple, foolish girl, so I called her Strawberry Shortcake (which was as much of a compliment as I could muster). She would offend and correct us in class and was always super-eager to follow a white male figure. She never did the reading (or if she did, she wasn’t bright enough to understand it), so she never got as far with her corrections as she did with her offensive comments. Despite her obvious deficiencies, she was treated better than most BIPOC students who were light years ahead of her. Now 25 years later, she still hasn’t finished her incomplete grades or her degree. Hey Strawberry Shortcake (I don’t remember your real name, but you know who you are): if you seein this, holla at me so I can re-heat this old beef with you. Never respected you, never will. Maybe start doing some reading this time though!

It wasn’t enough for faculty to include a race chapter or a few BIPOC scholars here and there in their courses; these professors needed to unthink their whole disposition and logic. After all, I couldn’t very well apply Mickey D’s thinking to Black life and arrive at anything other than more routine racism. Some of those same intellectually and politically compromised scholars I wiped my behind with more than 20 years ago are still assigned to graduate students in my discipline. Political irrelevance and white reading lists remain intact. Like, are yall even reading? Just out here Strawberry Shortcaking? Do yall just quote the BIPOC authors you see someone else reference? Or do yall just follow GenAI’s equally white suggestions and word combinations? If you don’t actually implement and materialize the BIPOC thought you claim to study, then you didn’t really read it. As it ends up, the reading methodology my undergraduate mentors taught me still works very well; it rises right back up and shapes how I hear every department meeting, every “cohort meeting,” and every professional space.

Needless to say, I was intimidated when I first started teaching graduate classes 16+ years ago.  How would I ever live up to my mentors? This semester I designed a graduate course called FREEDOM SCHOOLS: THE RHETORICS AND HISTORIES OF BLACK EDUCATION. Teaching graduate students is still an awesome responsibility, but I have my own approach now. The one thing I always avoid, especially today, is the inclusion of BIPOC theorists without any knowledge and understanding of their deep, intellectual genealogies. As my own undergraduate mentors attest, some of us didn’t just start putting BIPOC scholars on our syllabi yesterday, hoping to chase the newest and hottest theories for relevance without really knowing them. Everybody gotta start somewhere though, so I’m not knocking folx who assign authors and theories whose genealogies they don’t fully know yet. It’s one thing to not know the genealogy though; it’s another to never imagine there is a genealogy and/or situate everything in whiteness/white scholarship because that’s the only place where you locate history and humanity.

If there were ever a time and place to fiercely examine Black educational studies within the long, long tradition of this theory and protest work, that time is now! Black education in the United States is a critical praxis and protest tradition that meticulously planned and deeply imagined my intellectual and political learning from the moment our enslaved ancestors taught themselves to read in defiance of white “owners.” Unlike so many other spaces, Black education does not belong to a single discipline— it pre-exists this kind of university codification. How do you teach a radical genealogy like that? Especially when folx need it even more during nationalist, white supremacist shock and awe campaigns? 

The pedagogy must be deliberate, that’s for sure. Of course, I could assign so much reading that my students feel like their heads are on a swivel each week. That kind of teaching is rooted in racial capitalism and looks like the kind of bodily burdensomeness and energy depletion of plantation life. And that’s just too redundant for Black folx.

These days I rely on many communal reading strategies where we are not all always reading the same thing, but each one is teaching one. At its best, it gives you depth and breadth via communal learning of multiple essays and books without over-exhaustion. This semester’s zine project was one such example. Each student educated the class on a specific text and created a public zine to celebrate the text. For the first time in seven years, I haven’t had blatantly, racist graduate students in my classes putting things in writing even MORE stupid-brave than Mickey D (more on this in forthcoming publications). So I have been sharing this semester’s zines and syllabus more. I didn’t share in the years before, because I don’t amplify racist harm to BIPOC from Ph.D. students’ writing– the programs that have selected and promoted them already do enough of that. White supremacy doesn’t need more support and airtime and certainly won’t get it from me. This was a different kind of semester though and I’m grateful. May the Mickey Ds and Strawberry Shortcakes never find my classrooms again since I’ve certainly had my fill of them.

As of today, the grades are in and the semester is officially over. I’ll close it all the way out by sharing this semester’s YA novels. My class also centered 31 Black Speculative Young Adult (YA) novels across two weeks. We can’t only read what Eve Tuck calls “damage-centered” research, so Black YA AfroFuturism is where I see possibility and shape/place-shifting. It gives a face, narrative, and materialism to the refusal and resistance that are our birthright. Yes, the kind of racial antagonisms against Black life described here are rampant. But that’s not all Black living and learning comprise. Imagination and creativity are also always doing their work. There are now so many fabulous Black Speculative YA books that I had to narrow the choices down by focusing only on Black Speculative YA books that intersect with schooling.

Here are the semester’s books (use the arrows at left and right to see the 31 books):

*All starred books are texts in the series not out yet or that I haven’t read yet, so, sorry, can’t tell you nuthing about those right now.

The Civil Rights Movement ushered in a “Renaissance” in Black Children’s Literature/picture books. Black Lives Matter did the same, but especially for Black YA novels this time around the bend. This is not to say that we have so many Black YA & picture books now that we don’t desperately need more, only that some cracks in the hard pavement opened up and Black YA writers had their pens already ready and came through. You can’t ban this! Black Education has always been and will always be!

In some of these books, all by Black authors, Black youth attend Black magical schools. Imagine Marvel’s X-Men School, but all Black, and in Wakanda! Oh my, the things these Black youth will do! Other times, Black youth attend white magical schools or diverse schools where racist antagonisms are rampant since not even magic can unmoor anti-Blackness. Other books celebrate Black youth and their school-friends living their dreams over summer vacation by doing things like hanging with the elders in the spirit realm. Still other books show Black magical children struggling to navigate color castes and economic hierarchies without zapping everyone to pieces (which is what I would do if you messed around and gave me some superpowers). One of my favorite books centered a little Black girl, Onyeka, who always tried to hide her thick, volume-magnified, gravity-defying hair. When Onyeka comes into her power, her hair becomes super-kinetic. Her glorious follicles even rescued her best friend from drowning—and then just looped back to her scalp like nuthin had just happened. Onyeka wears a crown indeed as do all her fellow Black brothers and sisters in these YA books… and in our classrooms!

We started this fall semester with scholars who offer formidable critiques of Brown v. Board of Education, since the course is 70 years after Brown was decided. As Gloria Ladson-Billings argues: “People in this country have grown comfortable and accustomed to living racially segregated lives. We live in segregated neighborhoods. We worship in segregated churches and mosques. We work in segregated professions. We receive unequal health care, banking and loan, and other social services. Why wouldn’t we receive segregated and inequitable schooling? Schooling is merely a symptom of our larger experience. BROWN is an ideal that America has embraced in theory but not in reality. After 30 years of writing about BROWN, I have concluded that we are content to commemorate the decision but not commit to its principles.” Now 70 years later, racial justice and equity in schooling are, at best, an empty promise and performative gesture with a nationalist campaign that tries to undo Brown every week. These extreme sports of racism aren’t new in the history of Black education though and the Mickey Ds and Strawberry Shortcakes have always been willing participants. They may act as if they are working for everyone’s good, but their anti-Blackness oozes from every utterance and decision. Black education acknowledges that this fight might be tiresome, but we have never lost. We have other legacies our ancestors have built for us.

To CCW Cyphers and Our Charge to Radically Imagine!

Click here for our FULL playlist— a soundtrack to close the 2023 conference!

To my CCW cyphers,

I just arrived to Denver today and so I want to situate myself on this Land.  I begin this letter to you by acknowledging that the land on which we are meeting is the territory of the Cheyenne and Arapaho peoples and all of their ancestors, past, present, and future.  Here on this Land, I am committed to undoing white settler colonialism in the ways in which I work, speak, and act as part of my acknowledgement.  As a descendant of enslaved Africans on stolen lands, I am among those whose lived realities sit at the intersection of what I call an INTERTWINED ABOMINATION — kidnapped from one land and forced to labor on stolen land… as such I am called to work towards a sisterhood of abolition and decolonization against apartheid, settler colonialism, genocide, and settler occupation everywhere.

For a visual description: I am a light-skinned Black woman wearing three afro-puffs down her head in an afro-puff/mohawk fashion. The puffs are in the color of brown and gold in T27 Marley Hair. It’s giving the lowwww-key version of a HIGH-key Lady Charlotte of Bridgerton. I am wearing a black cowl neck shirt and black pants with a very long jewel green bib necklace and very large silver hoops. Thank you to disability justice activists/theorists who have charged us with making such visual descriptions so that we might all see our bodies and our multiple selves in deeper ways.

We have come together on this day of the conference to move towards radical imaginings.  For something like that, I always turn to Black feminisms and go way back for inspiration, examples, and ways forward.  This time I found myself sitting with Combahee River Collective Statement as I have so many times in my life. What I am sitting with today is how current this statement feels for me, especially these words:

We realize that the liberation of all oppressed peoples necessitates the destruction of the political-economic systems of capitalism and imperialism as well as patriarchy. We are socialists because we believe that work must be organized for the collective benefit of those who do the work and create the products, and not for the profit of the bosses… We are not convinced, however, that a socialist revolution that is not also a feminist and anti-racist revolution will guarantee our liberation…

A political contribution which we feel we have already made is the expansion of the feminist principle that the personal is political… Even our Black women’s style of talking/testifying in Black language about what we have experienced has a resonance that is both cultural and political…

We exist as women who are Black who are feminists, each stranded for the moment, working independently because there is not yet an environment in this society remotely congenial to our struggle—because, being on the bottom, we would have to do what no one else has done: we would have to fight the world.

When I return to the Combahee River Collective Statement today, I do so as a writing teacher, as a community literacies practitioner, as a literacies/composition educator.   Almost 50 years later, the Collective’s words still galvanize, the ideas still ring true, the impact still remains the same for me.  50 years later! So I ask us here, as part of our radical imagining, as part of how we do our philosophies of writing and literacy in communities: what are your words/ collective manifesto/ call to political action that will embolden the most marginalized amongst us, not just today, but 50 years from now?  This means something very different from what schools and school literacies present to us: a way out through bourgeois middle class consumptions and assimilations.  That’s not a future— that’s just more of the same of what we already have.  Radical imaginations change the very purpose of literacies and writing— because you don’t look to the here and now; you charge yourself for wide-away and far-far-away futures with the conviction that the future is moldable.

This is especially critical for me right now because this moment asks us to shrink back and make smaller demands.  We see DEI programs being banned and cut.  And while we must fight these bans and cuts for what they represent, we have to remember we were always asking for more anyway.  Many of us were deeply enmeshed in challenging the neoliberalist, for-profit, white comfort work of DEI projects, quoting decades of criticism by Sara Ahmed practically from memory.  Now we are asking and fighting for the thing that never went far enough.  

After the 2020 murder of George Floyd, countless people saw that it was lucrative to present themselves as anti-racist” from schools to professional journals to Target advertisements to university think tanks.  White racist, heteropatriarchal backlash came soon and swift, like it always does, and those same folx hightailed it out, all after claiming abolition and the Black Radical Tradition, but won’t even say and think FREE PALESTINE right now or challenge their publishers who are honoring racist school districts’ book bans.

That’s not the future. That’s not our radical imagining.  And that’s not the kind of writing the Combahee River Collective did 50 years ago.  I’ll end here with the Collective’s words: “As Black feminists and Lesbians we know that we have a very definite revolutionary task to perform and we are ready for the lifetime of work and struggle before us.”  Let’s radically imagine 50 years from today, 50 years at least, of future-making against the world we have now.  Understanding the Combahee River Collective demands no less than that.

In solidarity,

Carmen

Towards a Black Composition Studies: BLACK AS GRAVITAS (PART I)

Thank you to Spark: A 4C4Equality Journal for publishing the earliest version of this reflective essay in their Volume 2 dedicated to Black Studies edited by Sherri Craig & Karrieann Soto Vega. I will be building on this essay throughout this year as part of a new project. This year is a crossroads for composition-rhetoric so I am listening and looking closely at those who really step up to the plate or miss the moment as has happened at every past Black Protest moment for this field. In the coming weeks, I am especially working towards framing composition studies as a place that does dynamic, on-the-ground work to transform the what, how, and why of university curriculum and instruction towards radical, anti-racist, intersected, Black feminist, fugitive goals.

I am a professor in the academy today because young Black people burnt off all of somebody’s edges to get me here.  Once upon a time, I was out there edge-snatching as a Black college student too.  It’s a Black intellectual inheritance.

Black studies and an ongoing radical Black presence in the academy are not the result of a conscientious and interested hiring committee, a department’s desire to represent African American content, a university’s commitment to a multiracial university, or a profession’s/professional organization’s vision of radical democratic relevance.  None of that truly exists in the academy.  Only the adoption of a bourgeois, white, cishetero, masculinist individualism would cause a Black scholar to think that they are here because of the quality of their work or their uncanny skills at navigating white supremacist institutions.  We are here because young Black people and their radical allies demanded it in cities and hamlets everywhere, burning it down when they had to. I am certainly talking about current contexts but I am also historicizing this all way back to the activism related to new visions of schooling in post-emancipation, ongoing into the early 1900s with the New Negro Movement. The Black college student protesters of the 1970s are legendary in how they heralded the multiracial diversity that we see at places like the City University Of New York and other universities today with racially/ethnically diverse student bodies.  These student protesters were the political heirs to Black students at HBCUs who designed their own practices in the Civil Rights Movement decades before.  These 1950s HBCU students can trace themselves back to the major wave of Black student protests at the HBCUs in the 1920s when their colleges’ administration and faculty were mostly white. These historical lessons have been well documented now by many scholars across the K-16 education spectrum, including myself, so I won’t delve deeper.  The point is this: If any aspect of what we do is not in alignment with this foundation on Black youth, then it ain’t Black studies.

As I reflect on the role of Black students in the academy here, I interrupt my own alphabetic text with Black undergraduate students’ visual work in my most recent classroom, Introduction to African American Rhetoric.  The class was interrupted by the Spring 2020 school shutdown under the Coronavirus resulting in a revised syllabus that I called The Spring 2020 Corona Remix. Many mainstream white students across the college were complaining that they wanted more synchronous access to everything and everyone, despite the fact that their socially marginalized peers were self-proclaiming that they were having issues around income, health, housing, food security, wifi access, and disability and so needed alternative accommodations.  Meanwhile, my own Black students were mailing visual projects to my home (an option rather than just digital assignments) that marked the Blackness of an engagement with COVID-19 in ways that will always stay with me.  Their work is centered here visually so that I can see them as I reflect forwards.  Visual work is always critical for me because Black Visuality is more than multimodality; it is an affective and spiritually redemptive space that continually re-processes the dignity of Black Life in a world that insists upon Black Death.  Such student work in my classrooms guides my visions of a Black Composition Studies for an anti-racist university.

Every university assignment that I have ever had is the direct result of these students’ Black insurgency which is always visible for me on the paper, canvas, and screen. Each of my tenure track jobs has given me a valuable lesson about the role of this Black insurrection and white colonization, lessons that form not only my intellectual and political relation to Black Studies and Black youth but also my daily reality. I relay these lessons here as a foundation to realizing a Black Composition Studies. Composition studies in the university today is fraught with a colonial history on so many levels. We are most often housed in English departments that overshadow our labor and intellectual work. We still most often function as the illegitimate stepchildren of literary theory which often imagines itself as the only critical space that only rethinks the world and as the only frontrunner of English studies. With literary studies lost in its own elitist self-delusions of bourgeois grandeur, composition studies inherits the daily legacy of what English departments actually do: maintain the colonial legacy of the English language. I could write books on the white settler colonial logic that I hear daily in English department to describe teaching (or rather, lecturing), students’ abilities, language variation, writing assignments, etc. Put most simply, composition studies is the space that focuses on language, particularly the teaching of writing while our cousins in communication studies (who left English departments long ago) focus in on speaking— in its most simplistic point of origins (we all do more than that). Together, we and our cousins confront the dailyness of communication systems in the western world that have annihilated non-white languages and therefore ways of being that do not conform to whiteness. We and our cousins therefore always sit at the crossroads: automate colonization as an institutional pedagogy and rhetorical apparatus… or overthrow it. Black composition studies goes for the latter and, as such, our close proximity to the non-compliant racial protests of Black students has to always stay central.

These are notecards that I received in the mail last spring as a reading response to the course assignment.

When I first began writing about insurgent Black students, I distinctly remember essay reviewers, especially men, arguing that my ideas of Black college students were romantic and essentialist.  In their minds (and ostensibly pedagogies), only they seemed to possess the answers to and practices of a radical protest and scholarly vision in the university.  This ongoing imagination of a university without Black students’ presence (or where they are merely the passive receptacles of the “expert” scholars of Black Studies and/or Composition-Rhetoric Studies) is an egregious form of white supremacist education.  Black students stay at the center of my presence in the academy and in the theoretical work that I do here, not as metaphor or cross to bear, but as the purveyor of a radical, literate/language alternative to who and what count here.

Here’s my first story that gets at more of what I mean. My first, tenure track job was at a Colonized State University in 2005.  They needed someone who could bridge what they called “developmental” writing, urban schools, the distrust of the surrounding Black community, low enrollments of students of color in the major, and attitudinal Black graduate students who were, at best, bored.  Them white folk at that college had been dragged so bad that they had to do something and so they hired me. I learned there that white racist resistance in universities takes the form of really slow or non-moving processes.  White faculty were always: scheduling meetings for discussions on how they feel, scheduling meetings to gauge their collective “temperature,” scheduling meetings to read the agenda out loud, reading the bylaws (most often out loud in meetings), revising the bylaws (read out loud all over again), thinking things over, looking into things, talking to you about your ideas and concerns, and planning to get back to you about your questions (which usually resulted in apologies for non-information and/or more unforeseen delays).  Every process took forever and ultimately went nowhere because white supremacy always takes up a whole lot of time, effort, and policy to stand still and stay the same.  These are not processes that are driven by Black folx or a vision for hiring them; it is Black protest that speeds up time and resets the energy in the academy. None of them meetings and discussions produced change and worked to stall Black freedom more than anything else. All of them folk at the Colonized State University are out here somewhere today, still meeting, revising them same bylaws (and probably still reading them out loud), discussing, thinking, looking into stuff, talking— yup, still doing all of that, and still accomplishing nothing of value for Black lives.  It’s not an accident. Black composition studies always recognizes the micro and yet overdetermined white supremacist processing of our schools and programs and imagines time, space, and possibility differently.

My next tenure track job was at a Colonized Religious University.  Before my arrival in 2008, the Black graduate students had showed all the way out, especially on online discussion boards.  I see you, Jessica Barros and Todd Craig, then and now.  Them white folk didn’t know what to do there either, except to hire me.  I learned about the racism of writing program administration there.  I also learned that I would walk alone in my field because I didn’t know a single professor in my profession who I would have truly called an ally or even friend back then.  It was a hard and lonely lesson, at first, but one that I am forever grateful for because it sharpened my lens on whiteness in my discipline.  The levels of anti-Blackness that I witnessed at the hands of my fellow writing program administrators (WPAs) were disgusting and no one— and I mean no one— was willing to even notice it, much less talk about it.  Anti-Black faculty were rewarded, awarded, buddied up, and promoted to next levels without hesitation. No one in my department—especially not the self-righteous, self-proclaimed-radical literature faculty, the dean’s office, or the provost’s quarters would address any of it.   And no one in the field was even acting like anti-Black racism was part of WPA.  It ain’t a coincidence that the WPA-Listserv remained so white and so racist for so long.  There is actually a whole stain of scholarship that suggests that WPAs are activists because they act in defiance against university systems that oppress student learning.  I read that stuff and can only ask: whatchu talmbout Willis? I have never witnessed such a WPA when it comes to anti-Black classrooms and the writers of those very same theories are as anti-Black as anyone else in the racist institutions that permeate the U.S.  Racist WPA work is not the kind of programming that is relevant to Black youth literacies or the work of Black education; this is not a space that prioritizes the hiring of folk like me either.  WPAs are only now getting called out and still today you simply need something labeled an anti-racist grading system or rubric and you too can continue to mete out anti-Blackness with your WPA work. It’s not like any of this is hidden from view or political dispositions, unless, of course, you refuse to see. Black composition studies is about a disruptive kind of vision and envisioning for schooling.

My next position was in 2013 at a Colonized City University with a student population that was 75% Black and Latinx.  It remains the whitest department I have ever worked in, with an incredibly self-righteously empty rhetoric of diversity and justice, often administered by a supra-white-wealthy elite.  They catch the heat, every once in a while, for all that whiteness given the history of Black and Latinx student protest in that system. And so they hired me.  I saw colonization most thoroughly there: a predominantly Black and Latinx student population with an abysmally low percentage of Black and Latinx tenure-track faculty.  It was a complete cocoon of whiteness.  Black presence was the pen-ultimate evidence of an awe-inspiring progress for which you were required to feel grateful, no matter how you were treated or marginalized.  When you were asked to do something by white administration, you were simply supposed to obey and sacrifice your own well-being because “these communities” needed you (never mind the fact that you and your family are “these communities”).  In my first year, the department even held an end-of-semester party to celebrate the retirement of two white women who study long-dead white people in Europe. The faculty came together in corresponding costumes and presented a well-rehearsed flashmob dance (that is what they called it).  There I was, in the middle of the city with the largest Black+Latinx population in the country, with the largest Latinx college student population in that area of the country (predominantly Dominican), with non-Black/non-Latinx folk dancing their hearts out in recognition of two white professors while dressed as Old English wenches, royalty, and fairies.  I’m not suggesting here that this event was evil.  Ridiculous?  Yes.  Harmful?  No.  The purpose of the event was certainly playfulness and jest, however, the spirit and politics of the mean-white-sorority-girl ethos from which this event was framed permeated the college. If nothing else, whiteness was quite steadfast.  These are not the bodies that centered my universe of being in the academy, not even for casual socializing or humorous encounters; it was the history of an alternative Black student universe that got me here.  At Colonized City University, whiteness remained centered (and often ludicrously so) no matter what else was going on around it. Black composition studies knows that white affect in schools is not neutral, safe, or accidental and so centers alternative embodiments and enfleshments.

And now?  As of 2019, I am at a Colonized Southern University where I see all of my previous colonial experiences cross-pollinating. Young Black women, both undergraduate and graduate, have been slicing and dicing white power everywhere they go on this campus. The penultimate expression is a lawsuit today that names all the names, insists on a trial, and will make history in ways the campus does not foresee.  The Black graduate women in the lawsuit are from my department and so, yup, they hired me (before the lawsuit, that is).  I don’t know exactly what is to come here, but I can certainly guess. I only know that I have learned the following rules about whiteness in the academy:

It will always put Black lives, urgency, and compensation on extended pause.

It will always be awarded, tenured, promoted, praised, compensated, elevated.

It will always present itself as right, just, and progressing forward (and sometimes even call itself critical and allied) for which Black folk are supposed to show gratefulness and awe.

It will always remain steadfast in how it centers itself everywhere all the time.

It will always ignore the deep damage and social deaths it causes.

It will always be contested.

It will always be unwritten.

It will never stop us.

I have yet to see anything different here. Black Composition Studies gives me this lens and critique but it also gives me the audacity to speak, fight back, and imagine an alternative way of thinking, being, and acting in the academy, in my classrooms, and especially in my field.

I am not suggesting that Black Composition Studies is only for Black folx. However, it ain’t for appropriation by folx in my field who continue to do stuff like write a Statement for Black Lives Matter in their departments and programs and not reference a single Black compositionist. Yall ain’t nowhere near ready and Black composition studies is here to let you know it. Black composition studies is not exclusive… but it is rigorous in the mechanisms and politics of its inclusions. 

Stay tuned for PART TWO…