BLACK WOMEN IS OUT HERE REALLY READING! (The 125+ Books I Read in 2025 c/o BlackBookTok, BlackAFBookTok, BlackBookStagram, BookAppCousins, and BookClubFam)

I pledged to read 125 books in 2025 and I did (more than that actually, but many were short novellas). Before January 1, 2025 dropped, I knew I needed an escape and otherwiseworld to sustain the chaos of the national political scene and these incessant Klan rallies that you find on every app, street corner, and government/campus meeting. Escapes are not a make-believe land though; they let you recharge and reimagine your current conditions with inspiration and creativity. I always read a lot of academic articles and non-fiction for the classes I teach every semester, so I don’t count that in my 125 goal. These 125 books were a mix of pure foolishness, pleasure, creativity, and divine inspiration. Yes, historical fiction (especially if it has a speculative twist) calls my name, but if BlackBookTok, BlackBookStagram, BlackAFReaders, ReadingAppCousins, or my BookClubFam started hyping any messy, dramatic, foolish, WTF-Did-I-Just-Read typa title in 2025, I MOST DEFINITELY read that book! What I didn’t get to, I stored in my TBR for 2026. My 2025 list is petty and hood and bougsie and triflin and edumacated all at the same time. Even though the rest of the U.S.A. might be out here struggling to read and comprehend basic words, BLACK WOMEN IS OUT HERE R.E.A.D.I.N.G. up a storm.

Quiet as it’s kept (for those not paying attention), reading has made a big comeback. The Black Romance Festival alone sold out its 2000 seats immediately when 7000 readers, mostly Black women, hopped online and tried to grab a ticket in the first fifteen minutes of sales, myself included. This culture of Black reading is all over BlackBookTok, BlackBookstagram, and the reading apps and I am here for it.

And it is a culture. There are TikTok/IG lives where folx just come to read as well as meet-ups in the park/bar/mall. I watch so many monthly reviews and monthly posts about books from Black content creators that I can’t keep up with it all. There are villains and bookbaes who I talk about as if I know them. I am on a first-name basis with every author I have read this year (the authors may not know me, but I’m their homegirl nonetheless). Young Black folx in school do deep-explaining on where they sneak time to read for pleasure. The book apps clock what I read, track my yearly targets, curate my faves, link me with dope book-friends, take stock of the genres and authors I’ve read most, and collect my reviews and fave quotes.

The BlackBookTokers I follow will read the same book across multiple modalities: hardcopy, audio, ebook, and then another hardcopy or paperback if a new version has a beautiful spray. You will get jealous of all them bookcases lining every wall with the most comfortable loungers and pillows nearby, all cozied up with an ebook page turner, ebook holder, and/or fabulous bookmarks. Issa LOT! Just extra to be extra… and so beautiful.

Spare Bedroom that I Turned into My Library

The posts— on every app— are hilarious. I fall out laughing everytime I see a sistah dogg out some dude tryna slide in her DMs when sistahgurl BEEN sayin this account is only ABOUT BOOKS. Some of these posts have entire playlists to match a book’s vibe. Some books got BlackBookTok out here dancing and I mean gettin real low too. The diss tracks on the ableist folx who say audiobooks are not real reading are priceless. The diss tracks on the unlovable folx who say romance books are trash, especially books showing Black love in a time of unmitigated anti-Black hate, are unrelenting. And you better not go on any corner of the internet and criticize smut or hood books; you gon mess around and get WHUPPED worser than the goofies and opps in urban fiction! Any BookToker who never read BIPOC but got online to commemorate the death of MAGA’s favorite 2025 white supremacist got dragged and dropped in grand ceremonial style. It ain’t about canceling; this is called CONSEQUENCES. Some call their kindle their plug and give them names. I just ordered my paperwhite for 2026. Her name is La’ Kindela (yes, the apostrophe is necessary), a title gifted to me by one of my book club members (who, despite being the sweetest person, stay reading and loving serial-killer-fiction!!! It’s wild our here!) Dope book suggestions, great book community, real good reading, and absolute outrageousness! Reading saved me from the doom of 2025.

My favorite read of 2025 was The Reformatory by Tananarive Due. If you are an educator and/or historian of Black education or if you just like Black speculative fiction, you must read this book! It will blow your mind. I will never forget it.

These were my other top favorites in 2025, books that deeply inspired me for their sociohistorical content, ancestral connections, and/or divine writing style: Black Girl Unlimited by Echo Brown; The Day God Saw Me As Black by Danyelle Thomas; Empire of AI by Karen Hao, Ring Shout by P. Djélí Clark, Son of the Morning by Akwaeke Emezi; and Zeal by Morgan Jerkins.

Monday’s Not Coming by YA author Tiffany Jackson was also a 2025 favorite. This book wrecked me and had me crying like a baby. I read all of Jackson’s books this year and fell in love with The Weight of Blood, Let Me Hear a Rhyme, Grown, Allegedly, and Storm: Dawn of a Goddess. I actually liked all of her nine books (and will read #10 as soon as it is released). If you don’t read YA novels, Tiffany Jackson is your sign to start.  I saw the hype on her on BlackTikTok and followed it.

The King of Ashes by S.A. Cosby was another favorite. I read all of Cosby’s books in 2025, but I started with King so it will always be most memorable. I don’t really read crime-horror-thriller like that, but this one blew my mind. Sumbody go check on that man!  How he got stories like this just in his head?? This is another author where I saw the hype on BlackTikTok and followed it.

And lest folx think I’m playin about my love of urban fiction, one title also made my all-time fave list: Demon’s Dream: An Expected Love by Elle Kayson. Elle did that– all 750 pages! So many people got unalived in this book, I don’t even know where to start, so I’ll just say: Damien and Smoke don’t play (if you are the pearl-clutching type, this book is not for you because the spice rack in this book is HOT AF!)  Even for my old ass, these are my bookbaes for LIFE!

Here are all of the other books that I read, categorized according to my self-defined genres. This year’s reading categories for me are: A) “The People Could Fly” ; B) V.W.A.s, Haints, and All Our Hoodoo Cousins; C) A Black “Love Supreme”; D) D is for Drew Collins University; E) Poetics & Aesthetics; F) “Brickhouse”; G) WTF Did I Just Read? But… I Like It; H) “Baby, I’m a Doggggg, I’m a Mutt” Romantasy.

CATEGORY A: “The People Could Fly” | These are Speculative Black YA novels that intersect with schooling. I talked about these in a previous post (click here) related to my fall 2025 course, “Freedom School: Rhetorics and Histories of Black Education.” Because this category encompasses almost 50 titles (many of these books are series), this was almost 50% of my reading in 2025. I refer to these books as “The People Could Fly” to highlight the fact that the Black Speculative Imagination under white settler colonization begins with Black Diasporic Oral Traditions, often relayed to children, not with trendy academic theories in white university departments (click on the arrows below for the books I read).

CATEGORY B: V.W.A.s, Haints, and All Our Hoodoo Cousins | And just what is a V.W.A.? Vampires wit Attitude! BlackBookTok calls them viggas. Sinners ain’t show even half the stories that are out here. This was a big category for me this year, matching the speculative YA that fascinated me. There are so many BIPOC authors getting their lick back with BIPOC shapeshifters,haints, vampires, and conjurers that I give it is own category. For my 2025, these included: The Bewitching by Silvia Moreno-Garcia; Blood Slaves by Markus Redmond; The Buffalo Hunter Hunter by Stephen Graham Jones; Brothers Unholy by Nastee (yes, that’s the authors name! hey, may as well be true to you!); Chosen by a Vampire by Wynta Tyme (yes, that’s the authors name! cuz it’s cooold out here!); This Cursed House by Del Sandeen; The Dark Thirty by Patricia McKissack; The Deep by Rivers Solomon; Fang Gang 1, 2, AAAAND 3 by Cyn; The Good House by Tananarive Due; Her Stories: African American Folktales, Fairytales, and True Tales by Virginia Hamilton (a repeat reading for me); Khan’s Choice by Tacarra; Moaning Bones: African American Ghost Stories by James Haskins; The People Could Fly: American Black Folktakes by Virginia Hamilton (a repeat reading for me); Root Magic by Eden Royce; The Visitors: A Louisiana Paranormal Short by De’Andrea.

CATEGORY C: A Black “Love Supreme” | These are the Black romance books that I danced with this year. For my 2025, these included: Black by Joan Vassar; Christmas with the Steeles by Brenda Jackson; Elbert by Joan Vassar; Emancipating James by Joan Vassar; Flirting Lessons by Jasmine Guillory; Spilling the Tea by Brenda Jackson. This category will be infinitely larger in 2026, cuz I’m already makin my list and checkin it twice.

CATEGORY D: D is for Drew Collins University | And in a category all on her own is the indie author who goes by Desiree and Granger! I have an admissions certificate and sweatshirt from her fictional school, Drew Collins University— “a privately owned HBCU for Black mythical and magical beings and creatures” featuring all kindsa xxx-rated shenanigans. For my 2025, these included: Mortal Affairs; The First Family; Saint and the Queen; When a Wolf Loves the Moon; the Secret World of Maggie Grey.

CATEGORY E: Poetics & Aesthetics | Poetry books conjure words about the world’s horrors in ways that seem to surpass language, so I always read a few. Closely connected are large, Black art books for me (what foolish folx call coffee table books as if coffee needs a table) that visually take you to other worlds. For my 2025, these included: Camo by Thandiwe Muriu; Gumbo Ya Ya by Aurielle Marie; How to Survive the Apocalypse by Jacqueline Allen Trimble; If They Come For Us by Fatimah Asghar; Nana Akua Goes to School (a picture book but I’m counting it here); The Unboxing of a Black Girl by Angela Shanté.

CATEGORY F: “Brickhouse” | These fiction and non-fiction titles come with big and well-deserved acclaim so I had to read them. These writers are like that Commodore song: “awwwe, she’s a brickhouse/ she’s mighty mighty/ just lettin it all hang out… ain’t holding nuthin back.” For my 2025, these included: Ace of Spades by Faridah Ábíké-Íyímídé; Black Networked Resistance by Raven Simone Maragh-Lloyd; Chain Gang All Stars by Nana Kwame Adjei-Brenyah; Dominion by Addie Citchens; Junie by Erin Crosby Eckstine; Lone Women by Victor LaValle; No Gods, No Monsters by Cadwell Turnbull; Parable of the Sower by Octavia Butler (a repeat reading for me); Race and Digital Media by Lori Kiddo Lopez; Undrowned: Black Feminist Lessons from Marine Mammals by Alexis Pauline Gumbs (a repeat reading for me); We Tried to Tell Y’ll: Black Twitter and the Rise of Digital Counternarratives by Meredith Clark. And, of course, I must never forget Vera Wong’s Unsolicited Advice for Murderers and Vera Wong’s Guide to Snooping by Jesse Sutanto. I laughed so hard and need Sutanto to do a Vera Wong series for Netflix so bad (or at least hurry and give us book 3 and 4 and on and on)!

CATEGORY G: WTF Did I Just Read? But… I Like It | Look, if you a dude out here playin women, do NOT let Octavia Grant or any of the Black women writers in this category get holdt to your story. You will never be the same (or alive). For my 2025, these included: Cut Throat and Dear Vicky by Octavia Grant; Hood Holiday with a Chicago Menace by Dominique Nikail; My Sister, the Serial Killer by Oyinkan Brathwaite.

Category H: “Baby, I’m a Doggggg, I’m a Mutt” Romantasy | And in a category all by itself is romantasy. My 2025 romantasy dive centered Tessa Stone and Eva O’Hare. I saw the hype on them on BlackTikTok and followed it. Many of us are still on Amazon via Kindle Unlimited because of its vast publication of Black women indie authors (there is NO other reason to be buying books from them). Tessa Stone’s many, many novellas feature shapeshifters— mostly werewolves (hence, the Leon Thomas song reference as the title of this category), who have their own self-sustaining community in Michigan. These fine-ass Black men will tear you up if you try and come for one of their fated mates. The Black women in Eva O’Hare’s novellas go even further, literally: to other planets. For my 2025, I read Tessa Stone’s 13, first-published novellas and I read 5 novellas by Eva O’Hare. Again: if you are the pearl-clutching type, these books are not for you because the spice racks in these books are HOT AF! I had a 3-week run this summer where I was reading a novella per day by these two women. I just couldn’t stop. Black women can do anything (which we always knew) and this includes making wolves and aliens real fine and lustworthy. They out here turning Amazon out!

And now… it’s time to get ready for 2026. Let’s see if I can read 126 books this year so that I can sustain my mind and soul again! Television is getting whiter and so are movies and so are school curricula and so is Twitter and so is Nicki Minaj and so is GenAI and etcetera. As the elders would say: all you gotta do is STAY BLACK. I’m reading my way onwards.

Towards a Black Composition Studies: BLACK AS GRAVITAS (PART I)

Thank you to Spark: A 4C4Equality Journal for publishing the earliest version of this reflective essay in their Volume 2 dedicated to Black Studies edited by Sherri Craig & Karrieann Soto Vega. I will be building on this essay throughout this year as part of a new project. This year is a crossroads for composition-rhetoric so I am listening and looking closely at those who really step up to the plate or miss the moment as has happened at every past Black Protest moment for this field. In the coming weeks, I am especially working towards framing composition studies as a place that does dynamic, on-the-ground work to transform the what, how, and why of university curriculum and instruction towards radical, anti-racist, intersected, Black feminist, fugitive goals.

I am a professor in the academy today because young Black people burnt off all of somebody’s edges to get me here.  Once upon a time, I was out there edge-snatching as a Black college student too.  It’s a Black intellectual inheritance.

Black studies and an ongoing radical Black presence in the academy are not the result of a conscientious and interested hiring committee, a department’s desire to represent African American content, a university’s commitment to a multiracial university, or a profession’s/professional organization’s vision of radical democratic relevance.  None of that truly exists in the academy.  Only the adoption of a bourgeois, white, cishetero, masculinist individualism would cause a Black scholar to think that they are here because of the quality of their work or their uncanny skills at navigating white supremacist institutions.  We are here because young Black people and their radical allies demanded it in cities and hamlets everywhere, burning it down when they had to. I am certainly talking about current contexts but I am also historicizing this all way back to the activism related to new visions of schooling in post-emancipation, ongoing into the early 1900s with the New Negro Movement. The Black college student protesters of the 1970s are legendary in how they heralded the multiracial diversity that we see at places like the City University Of New York and other universities today with racially/ethnically diverse student bodies.  These student protesters were the political heirs to Black students at HBCUs who designed their own practices in the Civil Rights Movement decades before.  These 1950s HBCU students can trace themselves back to the major wave of Black student protests at the HBCUs in the 1920s when their colleges’ administration and faculty were mostly white. These historical lessons have been well documented now by many scholars across the K-16 education spectrum, including myself, so I won’t delve deeper.  The point is this: If any aspect of what we do is not in alignment with this foundation on Black youth, then it ain’t Black studies.

As I reflect on the role of Black students in the academy here, I interrupt my own alphabetic text with Black undergraduate students’ visual work in my most recent classroom, Introduction to African American Rhetoric.  The class was interrupted by the Spring 2020 school shutdown under the Coronavirus resulting in a revised syllabus that I called The Spring 2020 Corona Remix. Many mainstream white students across the college were complaining that they wanted more synchronous access to everything and everyone, despite the fact that their socially marginalized peers were self-proclaiming that they were having issues around income, health, housing, food security, wifi access, and disability and so needed alternative accommodations.  Meanwhile, my own Black students were mailing visual projects to my home (an option rather than just digital assignments) that marked the Blackness of an engagement with COVID-19 in ways that will always stay with me.  Their work is centered here visually so that I can see them as I reflect forwards.  Visual work is always critical for me because Black Visuality is more than multimodality; it is an affective and spiritually redemptive space that continually re-processes the dignity of Black Life in a world that insists upon Black Death.  Such student work in my classrooms guides my visions of a Black Composition Studies for an anti-racist university.

Every university assignment that I have ever had is the direct result of these students’ Black insurgency which is always visible for me on the paper, canvas, and screen. Each of my tenure track jobs has given me a valuable lesson about the role of this Black insurrection and white colonization, lessons that form not only my intellectual and political relation to Black Studies and Black youth but also my daily reality. I relay these lessons here as a foundation to realizing a Black Composition Studies. Composition studies in the university today is fraught with a colonial history on so many levels. We are most often housed in English departments that overshadow our labor and intellectual work. We still most often function as the illegitimate stepchildren of literary theory which often imagines itself as the only critical space that only rethinks the world and as the only frontrunner of English studies. With literary studies lost in its own elitist self-delusions of bourgeois grandeur, composition studies inherits the daily legacy of what English departments actually do: maintain the colonial legacy of the English language. I could write books on the white settler colonial logic that I hear daily in English department to describe teaching (or rather, lecturing), students’ abilities, language variation, writing assignments, etc. Put most simply, composition studies is the space that focuses on language, particularly the teaching of writing while our cousins in communication studies (who left English departments long ago) focus in on speaking— in its most simplistic point of origins (we all do more than that). Together, we and our cousins confront the dailyness of communication systems in the western world that have annihilated non-white languages and therefore ways of being that do not conform to whiteness. We and our cousins therefore always sit at the crossroads: automate colonization as an institutional pedagogy and rhetorical apparatus… or overthrow it. Black composition studies goes for the latter and, as such, our close proximity to the non-compliant racial protests of Black students has to always stay central.

These are notecards that I received in the mail last spring as a reading response to the course assignment.

When I first began writing about insurgent Black students, I distinctly remember essay reviewers, especially men, arguing that my ideas of Black college students were romantic and essentialist.  In their minds (and ostensibly pedagogies), only they seemed to possess the answers to and practices of a radical protest and scholarly vision in the university.  This ongoing imagination of a university without Black students’ presence (or where they are merely the passive receptacles of the “expert” scholars of Black Studies and/or Composition-Rhetoric Studies) is an egregious form of white supremacist education.  Black students stay at the center of my presence in the academy and in the theoretical work that I do here, not as metaphor or cross to bear, but as the purveyor of a radical, literate/language alternative to who and what count here.

Here’s my first story that gets at more of what I mean. My first, tenure track job was at a Colonized State University in 2005.  They needed someone who could bridge what they called “developmental” writing, urban schools, the distrust of the surrounding Black community, low enrollments of students of color in the major, and attitudinal Black graduate students who were, at best, bored.  Them white folk at that college had been dragged so bad that they had to do something and so they hired me. I learned there that white racist resistance in universities takes the form of really slow or non-moving processes.  White faculty were always: scheduling meetings for discussions on how they feel, scheduling meetings to gauge their collective “temperature,” scheduling meetings to read the agenda out loud, reading the bylaws (most often out loud in meetings), revising the bylaws (read out loud all over again), thinking things over, looking into things, talking to you about your ideas and concerns, and planning to get back to you about your questions (which usually resulted in apologies for non-information and/or more unforeseen delays).  Every process took forever and ultimately went nowhere because white supremacy always takes up a whole lot of time, effort, and policy to stand still and stay the same.  These are not processes that are driven by Black folx or a vision for hiring them; it is Black protest that speeds up time and resets the energy in the academy. None of them meetings and discussions produced change and worked to stall Black freedom more than anything else. All of them folk at the Colonized State University are out here somewhere today, still meeting, revising them same bylaws (and probably still reading them out loud), discussing, thinking, looking into stuff, talking— yup, still doing all of that, and still accomplishing nothing of value for Black lives.  It’s not an accident. Black composition studies always recognizes the micro and yet overdetermined white supremacist processing of our schools and programs and imagines time, space, and possibility differently.

My next tenure track job was at a Colonized Religious University.  Before my arrival in 2008, the Black graduate students had showed all the way out, especially on online discussion boards I see you, Jessica Barros and Todd Craig, then and now Them white folk didn’t know what to do there either, except to hire me.  I learned about the racism of writing program administration there.  I also learned that I would walk alone in my field because I didn’t know a single professor in my profession who I would have truly called an ally or even friend back then.  It was a hard and lonely lesson, at first, but one that I am forever grateful for because it sharpened my lens on whiteness in my discipline.  The levels of anti-Blackness that I witnessed at the hands of my fellow writing program administrators (WPAs) were disgusting and no one— and I mean no one— was willing to even notice it, much less talk about it.  Anti-Black faculty were rewarded, awarded, buddied up, and promoted to next levels without hesitation. No one in my department—especially not the self-righteous, self-proclaimed-radical literature faculty, the dean’s office, or the provost’s quarters would address any of it.   And no one in the field was even acting like anti-Black racism was part of WPA.  It ain’t a coincidence that the WPA-Listserv remained so white and so racist for so long.  There is actually a whole stain of scholarship that suggests that WPAs are activists because they act in defiance against university systems that oppress student learning.  I read that stuff and can only ask: whatchu talmbout Willis? I have never witnessed such a WPA when it comes to anti-Black classrooms and the writers of those very same theories are as anti-Black as anyone else in the racist institutions that permeate the U.S.  Racist WPA work is not the kind of programming that is relevant to Black youth literacies or the work of Black education; this is not a space that prioritizes the hiring of folk like me either.  WPAs are only now getting called out and still today you simply need something labeled an anti-racist grading system or rubric and you too can continue to mete out anti-Blackness with your WPA work. It’s not like any of this is hidden from view or political dispositions, unless, of course, you refuse to see. Black composition studies is about a disruptive kind of vision and envisioning for schooling.

My next position was in 2013 at a Colonized City University with a student population that was 75% Black and Latinx.  It remains the whitest department I have ever worked in, with an incredibly self-righteously empty rhetoric of diversity and justice, often administered by a supra-white-wealthy elite.  They catch the heat, every once in a while, for all that whiteness given the history of Black and Latinx student protest in that system. And so they hired me.  I saw colonization most thoroughly there: a predominantly Black and Latinx student population with an abysmally low percentage of Black and Latinx tenure-track faculty.  It was a complete cocoon of whiteness.  Black presence was the pen-ultimate evidence of an awe-inspiring progress for which you were required to feel grateful, no matter how you were treated or marginalized.  When you were asked to do something by white administration, you were simply supposed to obey and sacrifice your own well-being because “these communities” needed you (never mind the fact that you and your family are “these communities”).  In my first year, the department even held an end-of-semester party to celebrate the retirement of two white women who study long-dead white people in Europe. The faculty came together in corresponding costumes and presented a well-rehearsed flashmob dance (that is what they called it).  There I was, in the middle of the city with the largest Black+Latinx population in the country, with the largest Latinx college student population in that area of the country (predominantly Dominican), with non-Black/non-Latinx folk dancing their hearts out in recognition of two white professors while dressed as Old English wenches, royalty, and fairies.  I’m not suggesting here that this event was evil.  Ridiculous?  Yes.  Harmful?  No.  The purpose of the event was certainly playfulness and jest, however, the spirit and politics of the mean-white-sorority-girl ethos from which this event was framed permeated the college. If nothing else, whiteness was quite steadfast.  These are not the bodies that centered my universe of being in the academy, not even for casual socializing or humorous encounters; it was the history of an alternative Black student universe that got me here.  At Colonized City University, whiteness remained centered (and often ludicrously so) no matter what else was going on around it. Black composition studies knows that white affect in schools is not neutral, safe, or accidental and so centers alternative embodiments and enfleshments.

And now?  As of 2019, I am at a Colonized Southern University where I see all of my previous colonial experiences cross-pollinating. Young Black women, both undergraduate and graduate, have been slicing and dicing white power everywhere they go on this campus. The penultimate expression is a lawsuit today that names all the names, insists on a trial, and will make history in ways the campus does not foresee.  The Black graduate women in the lawsuit are from my department and so, yup, they hired me (before the lawsuit, that is).  I don’t know exactly what is to come here, but I can certainly guess. I only know that I have learned the following rules about whiteness in the academy:

It will always put Black lives, urgency, and compensation on extended pause.

It will always be awarded, tenured, promoted, praised, compensated, elevated.

It will always present itself as right, just, and progressing forward (and sometimes even call itself critical and allied) for which Black folk are supposed to show gratefulness and awe.

It will always remain steadfast in how it centers itself everywhere all the time.

It will always ignore the deep damage and social deaths it causes.

It will always be contested.

It will always be unwritten.

It will never stop us.

I have yet to see anything different here. Black Composition Studies gives me this lens and critique but it also gives me the audacity to speak, fight back, and imagine an alternative way of thinking, being, and acting in the academy, in my classrooms, and especially in my field.

I am not suggesting that Black Composition Studies is only for Black folx. However, it ain’t for appropriation by folx in my field who continue to do stuff like write a Statement for Black Lives Matter in their departments and programs and not reference a single Black compositionist. Yall ain’t nowhere near ready and Black composition studies is here to let you know it. Black composition studies is not exclusive… but it is rigorous in the mechanisms and politics of its inclusions. 

Stay tuned for PART TWO…

Notes on Racial Realism by One of the “Problem People”

Today, I am with my wonderful colleagues— Steven Alvarez, April Baker-Bell, and Eric Darnell Pritchard— at the Conference on Community Writing where we are facilitating a deep think tank on “Anti-Racism, Intersectionality, and Critical Literacies: A Teach-In and Work-In.”  In our opening, we will each do a short framing and then start our first day of discussions (day two will feature organizing).  This webpage collects the frame that I will offer about RACIAL REALISM. 

I decided to write out my thoughts today in the hopes that would be easier to follow. I am placing these notes on a website— so you can follow along. Or, you can just listen. (I make a sincere effort to do what most ENG teachers tell vernacular black intellectuals NOT to do— write the way I talk. As it ends up, that is the most difficult thing to do… so please bear with me here.)

I am hoping that we can frame ourselves pragmatically and theoretically as racial realists— as coined by critical race theorists and afro-pessimists. Racial realism, put quite simply, rejects any notion that we have made racial progress. That’s a fantasy of white comfort and white fragility rather than any kind of proximation to the lived experiences of black peoples. Progress is always politically conflicted, contingent on whiteness/white approval, and reversible via white supremacy… one step forward, and then sometimes two steps back.

Some of my favorite racial realists are my undergraduate students (though they do not use this language unless I am explicitly teaching CRT). In my undergraduate classes this semester, I often have weeks where students can choose any one of 50-60 essays and videos about the theme we are studying.  Since everyone has read something different, they are each asked to create a discussion question inspired by their unique reading. From our unit on feminisms of color this year, here were some of my favorite discussion questions that students created, none of which have easy answers:

  1. Given how many Puerto Rican and Mexican women the U.S. sterilized in the 1900s, what is the historical consequence of this for women of color today?  What’s the message that we still receive?
  2. Black girls are suspended from schools at much higher rates than white kids, even for lesser infractions.  What is the point of this? How do schools and colleges benefit from shutting out black girls/black students? … How do we protect black girls from schools?
  3. Given all that we have learned of racism, sexism, and inequality, why were you surprised that Trump won the election?

For me, you just can’t answer these questions without racial realism… in fact, you wouldn’t even think to ask them.

Continue reading

A Re-Mix of the Fourth Demand: June Jordan, Race-Radical Black Feminisms, and Teaching-as-Survival

Today, I will be participating in a collaborative workshop and dialogue that will discuss June Jordan’s transformative contributions to Black Studies, literacies, poetics, and solidarity.  Together, with Conor Tomas Reed, I will be discussing Jordan’s essay: “Black Studies: Bringing Back the Person.”

I decided that I would do a re-mix and use key moments and signals in June Jordan’s text as points of entry into her specific inventions of race-radical Black feminisms for writing classrooms, pedagogy, and education.

CCNY Protests

Black and Puerto Rican students and community members marching in front of Shepard Hall before taking over the South Campus of City College in 1969.

The fourth demand (in my title) refers to the specific list of demands made by Black and Puerto Rican student activists in 1969 at City College that the racial composition of CUNY must reflect the Black and Puerto Rican populations of NYC schools.  Jordan’s essay offers us a glimpse into her design of an educational experience for college students that does more than simply require white middle class discursive cloning.  Pedagogy—what we could call a BlackArts/BlackFeminist pedagogy for Jordan— is a deliberate attempt at transforming the white space of the academy, a project that will always remains incomplete and a project that few of us ever really participate in.

So… on to the re-mix… (my words are in italics and Jordan’s words are BOLD, in content and font-style)

june-jordanThe next day we began, the freshmen and I, with Whitehead’s Aims of Education

Jordan read Whitehead’s Aims of Education as an undergraduate student at Barnard in her Freshman English class.  Alongside Whitehead, her professor also assigned readings in Greek mythology and an essay about connections between Whitehead and Greece.  Jordan was notorious for calling out Barnard— especially in “Notes of a Barnard Dropout”— and the academy for being able to make Greece relevant to its students, as far away as it was in space and time, but not the Black folk right around the corner in Harlem or in Brooklyn, a train ride away. In her first college class as a teacher, a writing classroom at CUNY, Jordan kept Whitehead on the syllabus and instead of students using Greek mythology as their comparative text like she had to do as a college student, her students used the text of their own black and brown and impoverished lives/bodies. So, for me, what we have here is an alternative praxis of open admissions teaching at a white university AND an entry point for black feminist pedagogy in writing studies, both of which have remained largely invisible and ignored.

Toni Cade Bambara walked with me to my first class.  “Are you nervous?” she asked.

I just want a moment for pause and reflection for black women like Bambara and Jordan walking the halls together, checking in on one another in sisterly ways.  I don’t think I need to say much more than that, but I will point out here that the ways we inhabit the physical, white space of the academy are also important.

I am often stunned, though I should certainly know better, that: 1) so many faculty of color are more interested in securing white favoritism and performing white comfort than in waging race-radical rhetorical action against neoliberalist universities, and; 2) that so many white faculty have absolutely no ability to see or notice or care about the daily, racist microaggressions happening to faculty of color right down the hallway and the students at their college and yet authorize themselves to talk about bodies of color and educational praxis for them.

Jordan/Bambara collageThis image of these two dope sistas acknowledging and embracing one another needs to be another way that we imagine the alternative work of black feminist pedagogies in the academy.  As my grandmother would say, it’s mo’ than a notion.

[T]his essay…is, if you will, a POSITION paper. . .

I want us to keep this image of the position paper in mind, particularly in our current corporate climate where research and writing about schools have conformed to some of the worst, masculinist, most alienating positivist gibberish that I think we may have ever encountered.

The position from which we write and the positionings of our styles and discourses are not opposite running streams.  Jordan’s essay is also a call to question not only WHAT we write in our research studies of communities of color but also HOW we write it.  The positions that we take are often buried in an anthropological othering that our language performs…. even when we claim our methodologies are radical and participatory.

Continue reading